Re-descriptions Authors Stefano Milani TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment Downloads Download PDF DOI: https://doi.org/10.7480/overholland.2017.18/19.2444 Published 2018-06-15 Issue OverHolland 18/19 Section Polemen License Copyright (c) 2017 OverHolland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. How to Cite Re-descriptions. (2018). OverHolland, 11(18/19), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.7480/overholland.2017.18/19.2444 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Abstract Ezio Bonfanti’s essay Elementi e costruzione: note sull’architettura di Aldo Rossi (1970) can be regarded as one of the most advanced critiques of Rossi’s work. He examines Rossi’s projects, their inherent analytical characteristics, the relationship with a theory based on the possibilities for describing a project and (more specifically) describing it through an analysis that has to be conducted at the level of the composition. Bonfanti’s contribution can equally be regarded as a broader reflection on fundamental aspects of the discipline, for which he believes Rossi’s work is particularly suited. The two paths thus defined – one studying Rossi’s architecture and the other proposing a scheme for an analytical approach to architecture – therefore mean that the purpose and the subject of the investigation nearly overlap, albeit not to the point of a mise en abyme.